Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 28, 2015

NYYCIN

CIN won this trade +$48.8M surplus NYY won this trade +8.1 WAR
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net −$48.8M net +8.1
received +$8.0M+$8.0M ± $12M expected surplus · −$53.6M realized received 1.6 ± 2 expected · 7.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2016 odds 10% → 14% (+4.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Aroldis ChapmanP·28y·L/L
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$53.6M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized 7.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.3/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
1.65/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
CINCIN Walt Jocketty net +$48.8M net -8.1
received +$12.0M+$9.6M ± $105M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 5.3 ± 13 expected · -0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 2016 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Eric Jagielo3B·24y·L/R
+$12.0M+$9.6M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.8± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#26 overall draft pick → 0.46/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.46/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Rookie DavisP·23y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#449 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Tony Renda2B/OF·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#80 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Caleb CothamP·29y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.1± 3 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#165 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.03/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.40 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →