Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 14, 2015

CHCSEA

CHC won this trade +$0.0M surplus CHC won this trade +0.0 WAR
CHCCHC Theo Epstein net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Lars Huijer
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
SEASEA Jeff Kingston net +$0.0M net +0.0
received −$4.0M−$4.0M ± $27M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mike KickhamP·26y·L/L
−$3.7M−$3.7M± $27M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#198 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.3/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
-0.11/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.