Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 21, 1994

PHISEA

PHI won this trade +$2.4M surplus PHI won this trade +0.1 WAR
PHIPHI Lee Thomas net +$2.4M net +0.1
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $31M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.3 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 1994 odds 2% → 2% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Fred McNair1B·24y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $31M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#245 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
SEASEA Woody Woodward net −$2.4M net -0.1
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $14M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 0.3 ± 2 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 1994 odds 22% → 21% (-0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Shawn BoskieP·27y·R/R
+$0.1M+$0.1M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.3± 2 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.17/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.