Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 9, 2010

BALMIN

BAL won this trade +$6.4M surplus BAL won this trade +14.7 WAR
BALBAL Andy MacPhail net +$6.4M net +14.7
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $13M expected surplus · +$3.2M realized received 2.0 ± 2 expected · 14.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BAL's 2011 odds 0% → 0% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
J. J. HardySS·28y·R/R
+$3.0M+$3.0M± $10M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 1.9± 1 exp WARrealized 14.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.9/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
1.90/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Brendan HarrisSS·30y·R/R
−$1.0M−$1.0M± $8M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.1± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.08/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.50 age decline
MINMIN Bill Smith net −$6.4M net -14.7
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $30M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 1.7 ± 4 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIN's 2011 odds 0% → 0% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brett JacobsonP·24y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#133 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Jim HoeyP·28y·R/R
−$0.9M−$0.9M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.4± 2 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
#374 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.76 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.