Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 17, 1992

CINSEA

CIN won this trade +$55.2M surplus CIN won this trade +4.0 WAR
CINCIN Bob Quinn net +$55.2M net +4.0
received −$9.6M−$9.6M ± $14M expected surplus · +$67.2M realized received 2.9 ± 2 expected · 8.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 1993 odds 2% → 3% (+1.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kevin MitchellOF·31y·R/R
−$9.8M−$9.8M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$67.2M 2.9± 2 exp WARrealized 8.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.0/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
1.97/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
SEASEA Woody Woodward net −$55.2M net -4.0
received +$20.0M+$20.0M ± $17M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 2.3 ± 2 expected · 4.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 1993 odds 52% → 40% (-12.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Norm CharltonP·30y·B/L
+$20.1M+$20.1M± $17M exp surplusrealized +$12.0M 2.3± 2 exp WARrealized 4.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
1.20/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.94 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.