Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 5, 2014 · 3-team trade

NYYARIDET

NYY won this trade +$45.6M surplus NYY won this trade +8.1 WAR
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net +$45.6M net +8.1
received +$14.4M+$14.4M ± $42M expected surplus · +$54.4M realized received 3.8 ± 5 expected · 11.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2015 odds 23% → 37% (+13.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Didi GregoriusSS·25y·L/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$54.4M 3.8± 5 exp WARrealized 11.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.29/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.76/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
ARIARI Kevin Towers net +$18.4M net +0.0
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $76M expected surplus · +$72.8M realized received 2.0 ± 10 expected · 11.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2015 odds 13% → 10% (-2.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Domingo Leyba2B/3B·20y·B/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Robbie RayP·24y·L/L
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $50M exp surplusrealized +$74.4M 0.8± 6 exp WARrealized 11.3
Prior
#356 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.15/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net −$64.0M net -8.1
received +$9.6M+$9.6M ± $42M expected surplus · +$8.8M realized received 2.7 ± 5 expected · 2.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2015 odds 8% → 5% (-2.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Shane GreeneP·27y·R/R
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$8.8M 2.7± 5 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
#465 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.55/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →