Rosternomics
← Trade Database
April 1, 1991

BOSSEA

BOS won this trade +$21.6M surplus BOS won this trade +1.9 WAR
BOSBOS Lou Gorman net +$21.6M net +1.9
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $38M expected surplus · +$16.0M realized received 1.0 ± 5 expected · 2.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 1991 odds 26% → 30% (+4.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mike GardinerP·25y·B/R
+$0.7M+$0.7M± $38M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 1.0± 5 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
#448 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
SEASEA Woody Woodward net −$21.6M net -1.9
received +$3.2M−$1.6M ± $14M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 0.8 ± 2 expected · 0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 1991 odds 4% → 3% (-0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Rob MurphyP·31y·L/L
+$3.0M−$1.8M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 0.8± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
0.55/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.91 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.