Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 10, 2015

TBROAK

TBR won this trade +$5.6M surplus TBR won this trade +2.5 WAR
TBRTBR Matt Silverman net +$5.6M net +2.5
received +$11.2M+$11.2M ± $79M expected surplus · +$15.2M realized received 4.3 ± 10 expected · 4.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2015 odds 19% → 16% (-2.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Daniel Robertson#662B/3B/SS·21y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $53M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 2.4± 7 exp WARrealized 3.3
Prior
BA #66 prospect (2015) → 0.48/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.48/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
John JasoC·32y·L/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.7± 2 exp WARrealized 0.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
0.71/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Boog PowellOF·22y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#619 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$5.6M net -2.5
received +$44.0M+$36.8M ± $17M expected surplus · +$9.6M realized received 4.9 ± 2 expected · 1.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2015 odds 2% → 2% (+0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ben Zobrist2B/OF·34y·B/R
+$36.8M+$36.8M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$9.6M 3.5± 2 exp WARrealized 1.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.0/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
3.51/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Yunel Escobar3B/SS·33y·R/R
+$7.2M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.4± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
1.38/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →