LAD⇄CLE

LADLAD Dan Evans net +$2.4M net +0.6

received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $23M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 0.0 ± 3 expected · 0.6 realized WAR

receives — most valuable first

Jolbert CabreraOF·29y·R/R

−$3.0M−$3.0M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 0.0± 3 exp WARrealized 0.6

Prior

no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr

Evidence

recent form -0.2/yr over 1.5 season

Talent

-0.03/yr blended

Horizon

4.0 control yrs

why ▾hide ▴

CLECLE Mark Shapiro net −$2.4M net -0.6

received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $21M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.3 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR

receives — most valuable first

Lance CaraccioliP·24y·L/L

+$2.3M+$2.3M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0

Prior

#306 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr

Evidence

no MLB track record — leans on pedigree

Talent

0.21/yr blended

Horizon

6.0 control yrs

why ▾hide ▴

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.