Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 7, 2005

MILTOR

MIL won this trade +$47.2M surplus MIL won this trade +3.9 WAR
MILMIL Douglas Melvin net +$47.2M net +3.9
received +$21.6M+$21.6M ± $78M expected surplus · +$28.8M realized received 6.9 ± 10 expected · 10.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2006 odds 4% → 10% (+6.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dave BushP·27y·R/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$14.4M 3.8± 4 exp WARrealized 7.0
Prior
#55 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.95/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Zach JacksonP·23y·L/L
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 2.0± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#32 overall draft pick → 0.35/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.35/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Gabe GrossOF·27y·L/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $43M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 1.1± 5 exp WARrealized 3.5
Prior
#15 overall draft pick → 0.44/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.3/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.23/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.83 age decline
TORTOR JP Ricciardi net −$47.2M net -3.9
received +$16.0M+$16.0M ± $62M expected surplus · −$18.4M realized received 5.2 ± 8 expected · 6.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 2006 odds 70% → 46% (-24.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Lyle Overbay1B·29y·L/L
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$17.6M 4.0± 3 exp WARrealized 6.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
1.38/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
Ty TaubenheimP·24y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#549 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →