Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 30, 2016

ATLLAD

ATL won this trade +$2.4M surplus ATL won this trade +0.1 WAR
ATLATL John Hart net +$2.4M net +0.1
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $28M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 2.6 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2016 odds 1% → 1% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Phil PfeiferP·23y·L/L
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#101 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Caleb DirksP·23y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#463 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$2.4M net -0.1
received +$5.6M+$5.6M ± $22M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 2.3 ± 3 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2016 odds 58% → 57% (-0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Bud NorrisP·31y·R/R
+$2.6M+$2.6M± $6M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.8± 1 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
0.84/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Alec GrosserP·21y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#343 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Dian Toscano
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.