OAK⇄WSN

OAKOAK Sandy Alderson net +$1.6M net +0.1

received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $30M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.4 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR

receives — most valuable first

Mike FuentesLF·28y·R/R

+$0.6M+$0.6M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.4± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0

Prior

no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr

Evidence

no MLB track record — leans on pedigree

Talent

0.21/yr blended

Horizon

2.0 control yrs

why ▾hide ▴

WSNWSN Murray Cook net −$1.6M net -0.1

received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $44M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 1.0 ± 6 expected · -0.1 realized WAR

receives — most valuable first

Tom RomanoOF·27y·R/R

+$0.7M+$0.7M± $44M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.0± 6 exp WARrealized -0.1

Prior

no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr

Evidence

no MLB track record — leans on pedigree

Talent

0.21/yr blended

Horizon

5.5 control yrs × 0.82 age decline

why ▾hide ▴

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.