Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 27, 2008

ATLBOS

ATL won this trade +$20.0M surplus ATL won this trade +0.6 WAR
ATLATL Frank Wren net +$20.0M net +0.6
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $7M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2008 odds 10% → 11% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Luis Sumoza
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $7M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
BOSBOS Theo Epstein net −$20.0M net -0.6
received −$8.8M−$8.8M ± $14M expected surplus · −$20.0M realized received 1.2 ± 2 expected · -0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2008 odds 91% → 90% (-0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark KotsayOF·32y·L/L
−$8.6M−$8.6M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$20.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized -0.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.25/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.84/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.93 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.