Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 19, 2005

BOSSDP

BOS won this trade +$1.6M surplus BOS won this trade +0.2 WAR
BOSBOS Theo Epstein net +$1.6M net +0.2
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $11M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 0.9 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2005 odds 50% → 50% (+0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Adam HyzduOF·33y·R/R
+$4.2M+$4.2M± $11M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.9± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.35/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.58/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.82 age decline
SDPSDP Kevin Towers net −$1.6M net -0.2
received −$2.4M−$2.4M ± $15M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 0.0 ± 2 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 2005 odds 30% → 29% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott CassidyP·29y·R/R
−$2.2M−$2.2M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.0± 2 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.7/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
-0.03/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.