Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 6, 1985

ATLNYY

NYY won this trade +$4.0M surplus ATL won this trade +0.5 WAR
ATLATL John Mullen net −$4.0M net +0.5
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $24M expected surplus · −$4.0M realized received 0.6 ± 3 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 1986 odds 1% → 2% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Billy SampleOF·31y·R/R
+$1.0M+$1.0M± $24M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 0.6± 3 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
3.9 control yrs × 0.43 age decline
NYYNYY Clyde King net +$4.0M net -0.5
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $15M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 1986 odds 65% → 62% (-2.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Miguel Sosa
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.