Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 16, 1994

LADCIN

CIN won this trade +$0.8M surplus LAD won this trade +0.0 WAR
LADLAD Fred Claire net −$0.8M net +0.0
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $28M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 1.2 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Will BrunsonP·25y·L/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $28M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#577 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CINCIN Jim Bowden net +$0.8M net +0.0
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $28M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.5 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Ben VanRynP·23y·L/L
+$3.4M+$3.4M± $28M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.5± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#37 overall draft pick → 0.26/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.26/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.