Rosternomics
← Trade Database
May 31, 2007

SFGMIA

SFG won this trade +$20.8M surplus SFG won this trade +0.3 WAR
SFGSFG Brian Sabean net +$20.8M net +0.3
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $20M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 2 expected · 0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 2007 odds 3% → 3% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Randy MessengerP·25y·R/R
−$1.9M−$1.9M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
#326 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.06/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
MIAMIA Larry Beinfest net −$20.8M net -0.3
received −$16.8M−$17.6M ± $7M expected surplus · −$20.8M realized received 0.3 ± 1 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2007 odds 6% → 5% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Armando BenítezP·34y·R/R
−$16.9M−$17.7M± $7M exp surplusrealized −$20.8M 0.3± 1 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
0.30/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.77 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.