Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 17, 2020

DETBOS

DET won this trade +$0.8M surplus DET won this trade +0.2 WAR
DETDET Al Avila net +$0.8M net +0.2
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $5M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2020 odds 0% → 0% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jhon Nunez
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $5M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
BOSBOS Chaim Bloom net −$0.8M net -0.2
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $22M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 0.5 ± 3 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2020 odds 1% → 1% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt HallP·26y·L/L
−$1.8M−$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.5± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#190 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.10/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.