Rosternomics
← Trade Database
February 4, 2013

OAKHOU

OAK won this trade +$7.2M surplus OAK won this trade +3.7 WAR
OAKOAK Billy Beane net +$7.2M net +3.7
received +$13.6M+$13.6M ± $25M expected surplus · +$59.2M realized received 3.4 ± 3 expected · 14.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2013 odds 40% → 56% (+15.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jed Lowrie2B/SS·29y·B/R
+$16.1M+$16.1M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$55.2M 3.1± 3 exp WARrealized 13.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.7/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
1.53/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Fernando RodriguezP·29y·R/R
−$2.2M−$2.2M± $13M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 0.3± 2 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
0.15/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.42 age decline
HOUHOU Jeff Luhnow net −$7.2M net -3.7
received +$23.2M+$23.2M ± $42M expected surplus · +$52.0M realized received 6.3 ± 5 expected · 10.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved HOU's 2013 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brad PeacockP·25y·R/R
+$13.2M+$13.2M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$31.2M 2.2± 2 exp WARrealized 4.9
Prior
Composite #36.0 pedigree (Baseball America #36 (2012)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.38/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.40/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Chris Carter1B/DH·26y·R/R
+$8.1M+$8.1M± $31M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 2.9± 4 exp WARrealized 2.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.53/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
Max StassiC·22y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized 3.1
Prior
#123 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.