Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 23, 1993

WSNSDP

WSN won this trade +$20.8M surplus WSN won this trade +5.0 WAR
WSNWSN Dan Duquette net +$20.8M net +5.0
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $22M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 0.1 ± 3 expected · 2.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1993 odds 11% → 14% (+2.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tim ScottP·26y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 0.1± 3 exp WARrealized 2.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.02/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
SDPSDP Joe McIlvaine net −$20.8M net -5.0
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $25M expected surplus · −$16.0M realized received 0.5 ± 3 expected · -3.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 1993 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Archi Cianfrocco1B/3B·26y·R/R
−$1.1M−$1.1M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$16.0M 0.5± 3 exp WARrealized -3.0
Prior
#122 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.09/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.