Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 22, 1994

BOSSEA

BOS won this trade +$12.0M surplus BOS won this trade +2.2 WAR
BOSBOS Lou Gorman net +$12.0M net +2.2
received +$15.2M+$15.2M ± $34M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 3.1 ± 4 expected · 2.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 1994 odds 3% → 3% (+0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Lee TinsleyOF·25y·B/R
+$15.4M+$15.4M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$12.0M 3.1± 4 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
#11 overall draft pick → 0.66/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.0/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.57/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
SEASEA Woody Woodward net −$12.0M net -2.2
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $10M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 1994 odds 24% → 21% (-2.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tim Smith
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $10M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.