Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 28, 2001

SDPMIA

SDP won this trade +$134.4M surplus SDP won this trade +7.8 WAR
SDPSDP Kevin Towers net +$134.4M net +7.8
received +$24.0M+$24.0M ± $39M expected surplus · +$146.4M realized received 5.6 ± 5 expected · 10.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 2001 odds 2% → 3% (+0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark KotsayOF·25y·L/L
+$22.4M+$22.4M± $33M exp surplusrealized +$152.0M 4.4± 4 exp WARrealized 10.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.31/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
1.46/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
César Crespo2B/OF·22y·B/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
#90 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
MIAMIA Dave Dombrowski net −$134.4M net -7.8
received +$36.8M+$36.8M ± $47M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 7.7 ± 6 expected · 2.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2001 odds 23% → 17% (-6.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt ClementP·26y·R/R
+$29.2M+$29.2M± $41M exp surplusrealized +$16.8M 4.3± 5 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
Composite #10.0 pedigree (Baseball America #10 (1999)) — fell off 2 lists since, regressed → 0.36/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
1.06/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Omar OrtizP·23y·S/R
+$8.3M+$8.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.5± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#29 overall draft pick → 0.41/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.41/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Eric OwensOF·30y·R/R
−$1.0M−$1.0M± $8M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.9± 1 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.60/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.95 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.