CHC⇄WSN

CHCCHC Theo Epstein net +$9.6M net +0.8

received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR

Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2013 odds 2% → 2% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗

receives — most valuable first

Ivan Pineyro

+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0

Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

why ▾hide ▴

WSNWSN Michael Rizzo net −$9.6M net -0.8

received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $6M expected surplus · −$9.6M realized received 1.0 ± 1 expected · -0.8 realized WAR

Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 2013 odds 19% → 18% (-0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗

receives — most valuable first

Scott HairstonOF·33y·R/R

+$4.8M+$4.8M± $6M exp surplusrealized −$9.6M 1.0± 1 exp WARrealized -0.8

Prior

league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr

Evidence

recent form 1.4/yr over 2.0 seasons

Talent

0.95/yr blended

Horizon

1.0 control yr

why ▾hide ▴

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.