Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 7, 2005

MIACHC

MIA won this trade +$152.0M surplus MIA won this trade +17.7 WAR
MIAMIA Larry Beinfest net +$152.0M net +17.7
received +$7.2M+$7.2M ± $43M expected surplus · +$179.2M realized received 3.8 ± 5 expected · 20.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2006 odds 16% → 11% (-5.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Sergio MitreP·25y·R/R
+$3.8M+$3.8M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$9.6M 1.4± 4 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
#198 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.28/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Ricky NolascoP·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$176.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 19.1
Prior
#108 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Renyel PintoP·23y·L/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CHCCHC Jim Hendry net −$152.0M net -17.7
received +$23.2M+$7.2M ± $15M expected surplus · +$27.2M realized received 2.8 ± 2 expected · 3.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2006 odds 1% → 2% (+0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Juan PierreOF·28y·L/L
+$22.8M+$7.5M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$27.2M 2.8± 2 exp WARrealized 3.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.6/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
1.86/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.