Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 10, 1992

PHICHW

PHI won this trade +$3.2M surplus PHI won this trade +0.3 WAR
PHIPHI Lee Thomas net +$3.2M net +0.3
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $30M expected surplus · +$1.6M realized received 1.2 ± 4 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 1992 odds 6% → 6% (+0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Keith ShepherdP·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
#264 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CHWCHW Ron Schueler net −$3.2M net -0.3
received −$1.6M−$2.4M ± $10M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 0.1 ± 1 expected · 0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 1992 odds 44% → 43% (-1.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dale Sveum3B/SS·28y·B/R
−$1.7M−$2.5M± $10M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.1± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
0.04/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.