Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 10, 2007

CINKCR

CIN won this trade +$3.2M surplus CIN won this trade +1.0 WAR
CINCIN Dan O'Brien net +$3.2M net +1.0
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $19M expected surplus · +$3.2M realized received 1.9 ± 2 expected · 1.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 2007 odds 5% → 7% (+2.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeff Keppinger2B·27y·R/R
+$4.4M+$4.4M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 1.9± 2 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
#114 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.39/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.90 age decline
KCRKCR Dayton Moore net −$3.2M net -1.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $7M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved KCR's 2007 odds 5% → 3% (-1.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Russ Haltiwanger
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $7M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.