Rosternomics
← Trade Database
December 16, 2023

TBRLAD

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
TBRTBR Erik Neander net +$46.4M net +0.1
received +$22.4M+$22.4M ± $34M expected surplus · +$64.8M realized received 4.2 ± 4 expected · 7.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2024 odds 6% → 5% (-1.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ryan PepiotP·26y·R/R
+$13.1M+$13.1M± $28M exp surplusrealized +$44.8M 2.1± 4 exp WARrealized 3.9
Prior
Composite #62.5 pedigree (Baseball America #55 (2023) / MLB Pipeline #70 (2023)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.43/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Jonny DeLucaOF·25y·R/R
+$9.4M+$9.4M± $20M exp surplusrealized +$20.0M 2.1± 2 exp WARrealized 3.4
Prior
#761 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.37/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$46.4M net -0.1
received −$10.4M+$29.6M ± $41M expected surplus · +$18.4M realized received 10.5 ± 5 expected · 7.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2024 odds 79% → 83% (+4.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Manuel MargotOF·29y·R/R
+$7.4M+$5.4M± $9M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
1.06/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Tyler GlasnowP·30y·L/R
−$17.8M+$24.2M± $40M exp surplusrealized +$18.4M 9.4± 5 exp WARrealized 7.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.0/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
2.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.86 age decline
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.