Rosternomics
← Trade Database
February 3, 1987

MINWSN

WSN won this trade +$6.4M surplus MIN won this trade +1.3 WAR
MINMIN Andy MacPhail net −$6.4M net +1.3
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $34M expected surplus · −$16.8M realized received 0.6 ± 4 expected · 1.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIN's 1987 odds 4% → 3% (-0.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeff ReardonP·31y·R/R
+$3.4M+$3.4M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$8.8M 0.6± 2 exp WARrealized 2.8
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.38/yr blended
Horizon
3.9 control yrs × 0.45 age decline
Tom NietoC·26y·R/R
−$3.0M−$3.0M± $30M exp surplusrealized −$8.0M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized -1.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.4/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
-0.36/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
WSNWSN Murray Cook net +$6.4M net -1.3
received +$24.8M+$24.8M ± $69M expected surplus · −$10.4M realized received 5.5 ± 9 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1987 odds 14% → 18% (+3.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Neal HeatonP·27y·L/L
+$23.4M+$23.4M± $49M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 3.5± 6 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.88/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Yorkis PérezP·19y·L/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Al Cardwood
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Jeff ReedC·24y·L/R
−$0.6M−$0.6M± $38M exp surplusrealized −$8.8M 0.6± 5 exp WARrealized -1.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.12/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.