Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 14, 2015

PHIARI

PHI won this trade +$53.6M surplus PHI won this trade +4.0 WAR
PHIPHI Scott Proefrock net +$53.6M net +4.0
received +$5.6M+$5.6M ± $6M expected surplus · +$53.6M realized received 0.9 ± 1 expected · 4.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2016 odds 0% → 1% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeremy HellicksonP·29y·R/R
+$5.3M+$5.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$53.6M 0.9± 1 exp WARrealized 4.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
0.86/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
ARIARI Dave Stewart net −$53.6M net -4.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2016 odds 8% → 4% (-4.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Sam McWilliams
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.