Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 31, 1986

MINBAL

MIN won this trade +$3.2M surplus MIN won this trade +0.5 WAR
MINMIN Andy MacPhail net +$3.2M net +0.5
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $26M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.6 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Ben Bianchi
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Steve Padia
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Jeff Hubbard
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
BALBAL Hank Peters net −$3.2M net -0.5
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $35M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 0.7 ± 4 expected · -0.5 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mike HartOF·28y·L/L
−$0.8M−$0.8M± $35M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.7± 4 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.64 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.