Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 15, 1997

CHWHOU

CHW won this trade +$2.4M surplus CHW won this trade +0.1 WAR
CHWCHW Ron Schueler net +$2.4M net +0.1
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $5M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 1997 odds 4% → 5% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Julien Tucker
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $5M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
HOUHOU Gerry Hunsicker net −$2.4M net -0.1
received −$1.6M−$1.6M ± $0M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved HOU's 1997 odds 81% → 81% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tony PeñaC·40y·R/R
−$1.8M−$1.8M± $0M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
0.02/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.