Rosternomics
← Trade Database
January 11, 1995

CHCCIN

CHC won this trade +$0.0M surplus CHC won this trade +0.0 WAR
CHCCHC Ed Lynch net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $24M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.8 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Keith KessingerSS·28y·B/R
+$0.5M+$0.5M± $24M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.8± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#918 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.24/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.72 age decline
CINCIN Jim Bowden net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $10M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Greg Hillman
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $10M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.