Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 10, 1996

BOSWSN

WSN won this trade +$3.2M surplus BOS won this trade +0.9 WAR
BOSBOS Dan Duquette net −$3.2M net +0.9
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $41M expected surplus · −$12.8M realized received 1.9 ± 5 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 1996 odds 17% → 10% (-6.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Wil CorderoSS/OF·25y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$12.8M 1.7± 3 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
0.58/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Bryan EversgerdP·27y·R/L
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.05/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
WSNWSN Jim Beattie net +$3.2M net -0.9
received +$4.8M+$4.8M ± $83M expected surplus · −$9.6M realized received 4.2 ± 10 expected · 0.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1996 odds 10% → 16% (+6.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Shayne BennettP·24y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.5
Prior
#695 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Rheal CormierP·29y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.8± 2 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.8/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
1.20/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Ryan McGuire1B/OF·25y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.9
Prior
#79 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →