Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 29, 2024

ATLSFG

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
ATLATL Alex Anthopoulos net −$4.8M net +0.5
received −$17.6M+$0.0M ± $22M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 2.8 ± 3 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2024 odds 53% → 56% (+2.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Luke JacksonP·32y·R/R
−$2.2M−$2.2M± $7M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 0.4± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.36/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Jorge SolerDH/OF·32y·R/R
−$15.7M+$2.6M± $20M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 2.4± 2 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.99/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.81 age decline
SFGSFG Farhan Zaidi net +$4.8M net -0.5
received +$5.6M+$4.8M ± $25M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.9 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 2024 odds 8% → 7% (-0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tyler MatzekP·33y·L/L
+$3.1M+$2.4M± $10M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.6± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.40/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
0.43/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.85 age decline
Sabin Ceballos3B·21y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#94 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.