Rosternomics
← Trade Database
May 28, 2005

SFGCHC

CHC won this trade +$3.2M surplus SFG won this trade +0.5 WAR
SFGSFG Brian Sabean net −$3.2M net +0.5
received +$7.2M−$2.4M ± $14M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 1.6 ± 2 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 2005 odds 2% → 2% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
LaTroy HawkinsP·32y·R/R
+$7.1M−$2.2M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
1.13/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.95 age decline
CHCCHC Jim Hendry net +$3.2M net -0.5
received +$26.4M+$26.4M ± $46M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 4.8 ± 6 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2005 odds 24% → 24% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jerome WilliamsP·23y·R/R
+$24.9M+$24.9M± $42M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 3.7± 5 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
Composite #50.0 pedigree (Baseball America #50 (2003)) — fell off 2 lists since, regressed — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.93/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
David AardsmaP·23y·R/R
+$1.3M+$1.3M± $19M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#22 overall draft pick → 0.49/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.8/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.20/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.