Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 1995

ATLBOS

ATL won this trade +$24.8M surplus ATL won this trade +0.0 WAR
ATLATL John Schuerholz net +$24.8M net +0.0
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $32M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.5 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 1995 odds 78% → 79% (+0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mike Jacobs1B·14y·L/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#1156 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Marc Lewis
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $10M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
BOSBOS Dan Duquette net −$24.8M net +0.0
received −$10.4M−$10.4M ± $30M expected surplus · −$24.8M realized received 1.7 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 1995 odds 96% → 96% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt MurrayP·24y·L/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $28M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#41 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Mike StantonP·28y·L/L
−$12.2M−$12.2M± $10M exp surplusrealized −$23.2M 0.5± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
0.36/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.