Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 31, 2010

PITARI

ARI won this trade +$4.0M surplus PIT won this trade +1.1 WAR
PITPIT Neal Huntington net −$4.0M net +1.1
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $26M expected surplus · −$7.2M realized received 2.7 ± 3 expected · 1.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2010 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Pedro Ciriaco3B/SS·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Chris SnyderC·29y·R/R
+$1.1M+$1.1M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 1.5± 2 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
1.00/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
ARIARI Jerry Dipoto net +$4.0M net -1.1
received +$13.6M+$10.4M ± $19M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 3.5 ± 2 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2010 odds 2% → 2% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ryan ChurchOF·31y·L/L
+$10.0M+$9.3M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 2.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.2/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
1.38/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.97 age decline
D. J. CarrascoP·33y·R/R
+$2.5M+$0.3M± $7M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.8± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.59/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.89 age decline
Bobby CrosbySS·30y·R/R
+$1.3M+$0.5M± $10M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.7± 1 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.24/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.51/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.94 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.