Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 30, 2004

NYMPIT

NYM won this trade +$12.8M surplus NYM won this trade +4.7 WAR
NYMNYM Jim Duquette net +$12.8M net +4.7
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $26M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 3.4 ± 3 expected · 2.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 2004 odds 1% → 2% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kris BensonP·29y·R/R
+$2.5M+$2.5M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 2.2± 2 exp WARrealized 2.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 1.15/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
1.49/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Jeff Keppinger2B·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#114 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
PITPIT Dave Littlefield net −$12.8M net -4.7
received +$11.2M+$11.2M ± $38M expected surplus · −$18.4M realized received 4.7 ± 5 expected · -2.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2004 odds 2% → 2% (-0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt Peterson#88P·22y·R/R
+$8.3M+$8.3M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.5± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
Composite #88.0 prospect (Baseball America #88 (2004)) → 0.42/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.42/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
José BautistaOF·23y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $21M exp surplusrealized −$12.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized -1.1
Prior
#599 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Ty Wigginton1B/3B·26y·R/R
+$1.5M+$1.5M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 1.0± 3 exp WARrealized -1.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.20/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.