Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 27, 1989

SEANYY

SEA won this trade +$9.6M surplus SEA won this trade +0.2 WAR
SEASEA Woody Woodward net +$9.6M net +0.2
received +$2.4M+$2.4M ± $32M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.3 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 1989 odds 12% → 11% (-0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dana RidenourP·23y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#418 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
NYYNYY Bob Quinn net −$9.6M net -0.2
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $10M expected surplus · −$9.6M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 1989 odds 9% → 10% (+0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Steve Balboni1B/DH·32y·R/R
−$0.4M−$0.4M± $10M exp surplusrealized −$9.6M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.16/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.50 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.