Rosternomics
← Trade Database
April 6, 2014

LADCLE

LAD won this trade +$0.0M surplus LAD won this trade +0.0 WAR
LADLAD Ned Colletti net +$0.0M net +0.0
received −$4.0M−$4.0M ± $29M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 4 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Colt HynesP·29y·L/L
−$3.7M−$3.7M± $29M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#956 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
-0.01/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
CLECLE Mark Shapiro net +$0.0M net +0.0
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $6M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Dalton Von Schamann
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $6M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.