Rosternomics
← Trade Database
April 30, 1989

NYYTOR

NYY won this trade +$73.6M surplus NYY won this trade +3.0 WAR
NYYNYY Bob Quinn net +$73.6M net +3.0
received +$71.2M+$71.2M ± $16M expected surplus · +$95.2M realized received 6.6 ± 2 expected · 9.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 1989 odds 4% → 10% (+5.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jesse BarfieldOF·29y·R/R
+$71.4M+$71.4M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$95.2M 6.6± 2 exp WARrealized 9.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.9/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
3.29/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
TORTOR Pat Gillick net −$73.6M net -3.0
received +$12.0M+$12.0M ± $57M expected surplus · +$21.6M realized received 3.4 ± 7 expected · 6.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 1989 odds 82% → 65% (-16.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Al LeiterP·23y·L/L
+$12.2M+$12.2M± $57M exp surplusrealized +$21.6M 3.4± 7 exp WARrealized 6.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.61/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.