Rosternomics
← Trade Database
September 10, 1990

NYMHOU

HOU won this trade +$3.2M surplus NYM won this trade +0.1 WAR
NYMNYM Frank Cashen net −$3.2M net +0.1
received +$0.0M−$5.6M ± $11M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 0.1 ± 1 expected · 0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 1990 odds 89% → 90% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dan SchatzederP·35y·L/L
−$0.2M−$5.4M± $11M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.1± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
0.05/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.67 age decline
HOUHOU Bill Wood net +$3.2M net -0.1
received +$0.8M+$0.8M ± $16M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.4 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved HOU's 1990 odds 1% → 1% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Steve Larose
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
Nick Davis
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.