Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 20, 2022

LADDET

unsettledToo soon to call — players still accruing.
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net +$17.6M net +2.8
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $8M expected surplus · +$17.6M realized received 0.4 ± 1 expected · 2.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2022 odds 99% → 99% (+0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Trayce ThompsonOF·31y·R/R
−$0.3M−$0.3M± $8M exp surplusrealized +$17.6M 0.4± 1 exp WARrealized 2.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.27/yr blended
Horizon
3.9 control yrs × 0.39 age decline
DETDET Sam Menzin net −$17.6M net -2.8
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $0M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2022 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
cash / PTBNL
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.0
Cash or player to be named — no projection
Fan verdict — who overpaid?

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.