Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 27, 1991

CLETOR

TOR won this trade +$12.8M surplus CLE won this trade +1.0 WAR
CLECLE Hank Peters net −$12.8M net +1.0
received +$28.0M+$28.0M ± $51M expected surplus · +$11.2M realized received 6.8 ± 6 expected · 3.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 1991 odds 3% → 2% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark WhitenOF·24y·B/R
+$26.6M+$26.6M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$21.6M 5.0± 4 exp WARrealized 4.1
Prior
Composite #25.0 pedigree (Baseball America #25 (1991)) → 0.61/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.5/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.91/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Denis BoucherP·23y·R/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $30M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Glenallen HillOF·26y·R/R
−$0.6M−$0.6M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.6± 3 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.13/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
TORTOR Pat Gillick net +$12.8M net -1.0
received +$50.4M+$28.0M ± $38M expected surplus · +$24.0M realized received 6.6 ± 5 expected · 2.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 1991 odds 53% → 56% (+2.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tom CandiottiP·34y·R/R
+$33.8M+$11.5M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$26.4M 3.3± 2 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.2/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
2.27/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.97 age decline
Turner WardOF·26y·B/R
+$16.8M+$16.8M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 3.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#470 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.9/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.62/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.99 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.