Rosternomics
← Trade Database
September 30, 1990

LADDET

LAD won this trade +$3.2M surplus LAD won this trade +0.2 WAR
LADLAD Fred Claire net +$3.2M net +0.2
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $11M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.2 ± 1 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mike Wilkins
+$0.3M+$0.3M± $11M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 1 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
DETDET Bill Lajoie net −$3.2M net -0.2
received +$0.0M+$0.0M ± $40M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 0.8 ± 5 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Mike MunozP·24y·L/L
−$0.3M−$0.3M± $40M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.8± 5 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#74 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.7/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.