Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 27, 2013

BOSKCR

BOS won this trade +$2.4M surplus BOS won this trade +0.4 WAR
BOSBOS Ben Cherington net +$2.4M net +0.4
received +$16.8M+$16.8M ± $45M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 3.2 ± 6 expected · 0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2013 odds 90% → 91% (+0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Quintin BerryOF·28y·L/L
+$16.9M+$16.9M± $45M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 3.2± 6 exp WARrealized 0.4
Prior
#157 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.69/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.86 age decline
KCRKCR Dayton Moore net −$2.4M net -0.4
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $22M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 0.0 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved KCR's 2013 odds 26% → 24% (-1.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Clayton MortensenP·28y·R/R
−$3.0M−$3.0M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#36 overall draft pick → 0.26/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
-0.08/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.