Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 14, 2003 · 3-team trade

TBRCOLTOR

COL won this trade +$20.0M surplus TBR won this trade +2.0 WAR
TBRTBR Chuck Lamar net +$15.2M net +2.0
received +$10.4M+$10.4M ± $26M expected surplus · +$32.0M realized received 2.7 ± 3 expected · 5.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2004 odds 2% → 2% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark HendricksonP·30y·L/L
+$10.4M+$10.4M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$32.0M 2.7± 3 exp WARrealized 5.0
Prior
#369 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.89/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.75 age decline
COLCOL Daniel O'Dowd net +$20.0M net +1.2
received +$10.4M+$10.4M ± $27M expected surplus · +$16.8M realized received 3.1 ± 3 expected · 3.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved COL's 2004 odds 1% → 1% (+0.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Joe KennedyP·25y·R/L
+$10.4M+$10.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized +$16.8M 2.9± 3 exp WARrealized 3.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.97/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Sandy Nin
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
TORTOR JP Ricciardi net −$35.2M net -3.2
received −$5.6M−$5.6M ± $14M expected surplus · −$3.2M realized received 0.4 ± 2 expected · 1.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 2004 odds 3% → 2% (-1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Justin SpeierP·31y·R/R
−$5.6M−$5.6M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.4± 2 exp WARrealized 1.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
0.29/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.82 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →