Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 6, 2003

CINCHW

CIN won this trade +$20.8M surplus CIN won this trade +4.9 WAR
CINCIN Jim Bowden net +$20.8M net +4.9
received +$11.2M+$11.2M ± $43M expected surplus · +$20.8M realized received 3.6 ± 5 expected · 4.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 2003 odds 0% → 0% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
D'Angelo Jimenez2B·25y·B/R
+$11.0M+$11.0M± $43M exp surplusrealized +$20.8M 3.6± 5 exp WARrealized 4.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.90/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
CHWCHW Kenny Williams net −$20.8M net -4.9
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $22M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.2 ± 3 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2003 odds 78% → 70% (-8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott DunnP·25y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#308 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.