Rosternomics
← Trade Database
August 31, 2013

PHIBOS

PHI won this trade +$0.8M surplus PHI won this trade +0.0 WAR
PHIPHI Ruben Amaro net +$0.8M net +0.0
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $19M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 1.2 ± 2 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
Nefi OgandoP·24y·R/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
BOSBOS Ben Cherington net −$0.8M net +0.0
received −$0.8M−$0.8M ± $0M expected surplus · −$0.8M realized received 0.0 ± 0 expected · 0.0 realized WAR
receives — most valuable first
John McDonaldSS·38y·R/R
−$0.7M−$0.7M± $0M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
0.49/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.