Rosternomics
← Trade Database
March 28, 1994

TEXCHW

TEX won this trade +$4.0M surplus TEX won this trade +0.4 WAR
TEXTEX Sandy Johnson net +$4.0M net +0.4
received −$3.2M−$3.2M ± $58M expected surplus · −$6.4M realized received 0.0 ± 7 expected · -1.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 1994 odds 2% → 2% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Esteban BeltréSS·26y·R/R
−$3.0M−$3.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 0.0± 7 exp WARrealized -1.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.8/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
-0.28/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
CHWCHW Ron Schueler net −$4.0M net -0.4
received +$1.6M+$1.6M ± $29M expected surplus · −$10.4M realized received 1.2 ± 4 expected · -1.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 1994 odds 93% → 94% (+1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott EyreP·22y·L/L
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $29M exp surplusrealized −$10.4M 1.2± 4 exp WARrealized -1.4
Prior
#248 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.